300 Words or Less

Concise views on today's biggest questions.


Finding questions that Kenny and I truly disagree on are a little difficult, so from now on we're going to write our posts on individual topics.

Dylan Campbell: "Words"

Recently, many have criticized Barack Obama by saying that he is a great public speaker but will not be a President who can accomplish real change in America. Words are great, they tell us, but action is what counts. But since when is that a realistic preference? President Bush has, on many occasions, put action over words. He went to war in Iraq without telling us there were neither WMD’s nor a credible connection to Osama Bin Laden. While that war produced billions in revenue for civilian firms, he failed to mention how that benefited some of his closest friends. More recently, he wiretapped American citizens without informing them with a court warrant. So putting action over words, obviously, is not always a recipe for success (or constitutionality).

But to be fair, Bush hasn’t been silent for the past eight years. He famously told the former FEMA director that he did a “heckuva job” while thousands of American were left dead in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. Instead on taking appropriate steps to reduce climate change he told everyone it wasn’t a scientifically proven phenomenon. And in his early years as President he spoke a lot about paying down the national debt – too bad it has increased by trillions of dollars since he entered office. My point is this: words without actions and actions without words make bad politics and a bad future for our country. I do not know if any of these candidates will actually deliver on their promises but what I do know is that Senator Obama’s words have already inspired millions to take action. If only a fraction of his ideas become public policy he will infinitely surpass the sorry excuse for a President we have now.

For a great list and explanation of all the Bush Administration scandals, click here.

Kenny Hsu: "Spoiling the Party"

As the Clinton camp realizes that time and delegates are no longer in their favor, Hillary has played her cards as most being held at political gunpoint would. Negative ads in Wisconsin reminded the electorate that Senator Obama is indeed an inexperienced, big-eared mouthmatician who doesn’t want you to have health care. A surrogate at a rally kindly labeled his supporters as “Birkenstock-wearing, trust-fund babies.” She even reminded the nation that change couldn’t be Xeroxed from a friend who happens to be the governor of Massachusetts without proper MLA citations. Oh, and why shouldn’t the Michigan and Florida votes be counted anyways?

But she hasn’t been entirely on the prowl lately. Last week, she insisted that the “hits” she’s taken aren’t comparable to those taken by the average American (Clinton, Bill 1992). Plus, she was kind enough to ease us with her closing words: “Whatever happens, we’re going to be fine” (Edwards, John 2007). We’re going to be fine, huh? Well, with a he-said-she-said attitude quickly infecting the party, Hillary may be spoiling the once inevitable prospect of a Democratic president. She is to the DNC what the New York Times is to Senator McCain. Even so, the Republicans are still rallying around their candidate while Hillary drives the disunity further and further within the Democrats. Yes, Obama may be crushed by the ruthless hands of the GOP if he is nominated, but the Clintons are already giving them a pleasant head start.

Of course, if her prayers are answered and the Obama campaign does implode, Hillary might utilize that essential “experience” to ward off Republican foes. However, voters on her side might find it more comfortable to stay home in November after finding themselves disappointed in a divided, hostile Democratic party. But remember: we’re going to be fine.



Labels: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Kenny Hsu: "Education"

Our nation’s deficient health care, increasing poverty, and notorious crime rate are all urgent issues that sadly have not been given enough consideration in today’s political scene. However, though these concerns do deserve further attention by the Tim Russerts of the world, political leaders continue to neglect a central source of these crises: a deteriorating education system. Statistics are telling: America children are (mis)guided by an education system that is ranked 29th in science and falls behind twelve European nations in mathematics literacy. Citizens aged 16 to 65 ranked 12th in the world based on results of the International Adult Literacy Survey. Yet, the average American student ranks 1st in brain cells lost while playing Halo 3. These numbers, showing no signs of future improvement, provide a stark contrast to last generation’s education system that dominated global competition.

It shouldn’t be surprising, then, that our nation is saddled with socioeconomic troubles. Declining education standards burden future generations with poverty and crime, spilling into difficulties with economy, health care, etc. However, though this year’s candidates are eager to debate these issues, they spend little effort to address the ultimate source of such problems. Of the Democratic candidates, only former candidate Bill Richardson seemed to consistently assert that education reform be discussed. And though an increasing amount of the electorate agree that No Child Left Behind has disappointed, many find it difficult to understand why the federal program hasn’t lived up to its name. This election’s candidates, now wielding a bully pulpit stronger than President Bush, are responsible for educating citizens about the problem not by strategically stating their proposals, but by merely thrusting the issue into the political agenda. Yes, I said it: they must educate the people, that is, if they know what “educate” actually means.

Dylan Campbell: "Pork-Barrel Spending"

Ever since 1817, when John C. Calhoun provisioned for highway construction from a federal bank surplus, politicians have been diverting money to their own constituencies for political gain. Today, earmarking has overrun our congressional system and left us with a lingering budget deficit for the past eight years. As the U.S. looks ahead, with dreams of a revamped social system and a stronger economy, instead of raising taxes we must first do everything in our power to eliminate government waste.

The problem with earmarks is that there are almost too many of them to appropriately examine and validate each one. Every once in a while we hear of especially heinous appropriations (like the so-called “Bridge to Nowhere” in Alaska) but for every offense covered by the media there are thousands that go undiscovered. Barack Obama has suggested that the solution to this problem is transparency. This past June he disclosed all of his 2008 earmarks and has encouraged his political opponents to do the same. It is an honest effort towards fixing the process but in many ways this tactic falls short. For example, Robert Byrd, the longest-serving member of the U.S. Senate, has racked up over $3 billion in earmarks over the years while publicly defending his actions. As CBS has reported, he has funded over 40 projects bearing his name, including highways, dams, and office complexes. So why should the federal taxpayers fund his egotistical building sprees?

Unfortunately, earmarks create a vicious cycle. Senators in power divert funds to their own districts, who in turn benefit from the cash flow, and then re-elect their representatives for the incredible job they’ve been doing. Unfortunately, this type of crooked politics has become all too common in our system because all it takes is some political influence.

To see Senator Obama’s 2008 earmarks, click here.

For the CBS report on Senator Byrd’s earmarks, click here.

Labels: , , , , , , , , ,

I have high hopes for this blog. As the title suggests, the posts will be short and concise. By drawing on multiple perspectives I hope to keep the discussion as balanced and comprehensive as possible. If you have suggestions for the question of the week, feel free to email it to me. And whether you like what you read or couldn't disagree more with a post, feel free to voice your opinion in the comment section.

Thanks,
Dylan



© 2008 300 Words or Less | Blogger Templates by GeckoandFly.
No part of the content or the blog may be reproduced without prior written permission.